Filed Under (Uncategorized) by Miranda Tan on 20-04-2009
Check out our new white paper on PR 3.0: How the economy and the new media landscape is forcing an evolution in public relations, and what tools PR professionals must adopt to survive in the new environment.
http://www.myprgenie.com/user/white_paper
Filed Under (Uncategorized) by Miranda Tan on 19-04-2009
In these days of TALF, TARP, PPIP, CPFF, AMLF, TGLP and various other economic bailout programs, it’s probably a good time to bring up a basic rule of public relations: know your (stuff).
The PR professional who doesn’t understand the client, and what the client is trying to communicate, is useless. Any reporter can tell many stories of the useless flacks (PR reps) who not only don’t understand their clients, but hurt their clients by botching their stories. The PR professional who cannot explain what the client does or tell why the reporter should care about a pitched story, in layman’s terms, is opening himself or herself up to ridicule. And the reporter is unlikely to trust that PR rep as being knowledgeable or trustworthy on the next story.
Again, this is a basic rule, but before you write up your next press release about your client’s participation in TALF or get on the phone to pitch a TARP-related story, take the time to know what you’re talking about. Don’t be afraid to ask the dumb questions first so you don’t look dumb later.
Bailout acronym soup: A handy guide
A look at some of the government's financial bailout program
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29900110/
Filed Under (Uncategorized) by Miranda Tan on 31-03-2009
As we all know, we PR professionals compete against each other on behalf of our clients, vying for audience eyeballs and attention from our friends in the media. In the downsizing traditional media environment (declining advertising revenue/news holes/news staffs/news outlets), one area where we can gain an edge on our competition is through developing new media contacts. And by that I mean both developing new contacts in the media, and developing contacts in the new media.
I think all of us know a colleague or two in PR circles who aren’t exactly known for their ability to hustle. These colleagues are going to have a difficult time keeping up with media staff turnover in markets where newspapers and other publications are closing, and radio and TV stations are downsizing.
For the rest of us, it’s another opportunity--not only to have more up-to-date and comprehensive media contacts than the competition, but also to build better media relationships. We will know the post-downsizing, re-organized media outlets better and the new media startups better. And we will also know the individuals at these organizations better, along with a superior understanding of their news coverage and story production needs.
It will be tough for reporters and editors to adapt to the new environment. Whether they stay on in consolidated newsrooms at traditional newspapers or join new Web-based news organizations, news staffers will undoubtedly have to do more with less. Anything we as PR professionals can do to make their jobs easier helps to build these relationships. As with any relationship, you should try to add more than you are taking away. One example: Suggest stories and sources that you know they will value, even when you’re not pitching on behalf of a client. Your good deeds today will pay off in the future.
Filed Under (Uncategorized) by Miranda Tan on 30-03-2009
The ongoing saga over whether AIG executives should be forced to give up their bonuses raises an interesting PR angle. One lesson: Any company that partakes in a direct government bailout, or even participates in a government-sponsored economic program without direct assistance, should take special care to manage public perceptions.
As AIG executives learned quickly, nothing is certain when you are beholden to government administrators and members of Congress, especially in this economic environment. And AIG should have known—because, after all, good PR is a two-way street—that the bonuses would be viewed as outrageous by Joe Taxpayer.
Before private investment firms decide whether to bid on so-called toxic assets through the government-guaranteed loan program announced this week, those firms will undoubtedly seek PR advice on how they will be perceived by the public. If they will be viewed as potential saviors of the economy, that may help tip the balance in favor of participating. And if they expect that the public would see them as corporate welfare recipients, it may be enough to kill their interest.
Proactive public relations, of course, would help mold and manage the public perception of the company considering doing business with the government, before any crisis could develop.